Legal Opinion
FAGAN v. BARNHISER
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 19, 2025No. 2:24-cv-06012Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THOMAS J. FAGAN, Civil Action No.: 24-06012 Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. BRET T. BARNHISER, NANOLOGIX, INC., DR. JONATHAN FARO, DR. SEBASTIAN FARO, Defendants. CECCHI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on defendants Dr. Jonathan Faro and Dr. Sebastian Faro (collectively, “the Faros” or “the Faro Defendants”) motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17, “MTD”), which seeks the dismissal of pro se plaintiff Thomas Fagan’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint (ECF No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff opposed the motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.