Legal Opinion
Peerless Insurance Co. v. Wood
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 18, 1996PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff, Peerless Insurance Company (“Peerless”), appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Saufley, J.) declaring that the actions of Kenneth Hirst, an employee of the insured Hofsaes Construction Company (“Hofsaes”), are covered by a comprehensive contractor’s policy issued by Peerless. On appeal, Peerless argues that the Superior Court erroneously interpreted the exception in its policy providing coverage for the “occasional and infrequent use” of certain non-owned commercial vehicles. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Worcester Insurance v. Dairyland InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Maine Mutual Fire Insurance v. American International Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nautilus Insurance Company v. Michael G. Jabar, D/B/A Mike's Roofing Co., Lisa A. Varano and Stephen M. Varano, Stern Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Foremost Insurance Co. v. LevesqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Greenly v. Mariner Management Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Saucier v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.