Legal Opinion

In Re Hillary C.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 3, 2009No. 2 CA-JV 2008-0121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The sole issue raised in this appeal by the state is whether the juvenile court abused its discretion in declining to notify the Motor Vehicle Division (MVD) of the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) that Hillary C. had been adjudicated delinquent for violating A.R.S. § 4-244(33), which prohibits a person under the age of twenty-one from “driv[ing] or be[ing] in physical control of a motor vehicle while there is any spirituous liquor in [his or her] body.” According to the state, such notification is mandated by statute.

¶ 2 Although we generally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knapp v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. In Re Brandon H.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Webb v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Thomson v. Miller ex rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Martin M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. In Re Martin M. and Rene N.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API