Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1919No. Calendar No. 28,646½PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus by James Hamilton to compel Coleman C. Vaughan, secretary of State, to submit a proposed amendment to the Constitution.

1Per curiam

This is an application for mandamus to compel the secretary of State to submit a proposed constitutional amendment to the people at the next general election. The petition filed with the secretary of State was signed by 47,652 persons claiming to be legal voters. It is conceded that but 43,469 legal signatures were necessary in order to secure the submission of the proposed constitutional amendment to the people. The secretary of State refused to submit the proposed amendment to the people upon the ground that only 38,631 .of the signatures are legal; the balance of said signatures being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seneca Mining Co. v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leininger v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hamilton v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hamilton v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hamilton v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hamilton v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API