Legal Opinion

Beale & Strayhorn v. Clayborn

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1929No. 27727PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The appellee, Abraham Clayborn, instituted this suit in the circuit court of Lauderdale county against the Royal Peed & Milling Company, a corporation, Beale & Strayhorn, a copartnership, and Jessie R. Waller, and Jim Digman, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him in a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the said Royal Peed & Milling Company, and driven by its employee, the defendant Jessie R. Waller, and an ambulance owned and operated by the said Beale & Strayhorn, and driven by one of its employees, the defendant Jim Digman.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eason v. S. & E. T. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kniceley v. West Virginia Midland RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mayton v. T. & P. R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Wischam v. Rickards, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1890
  5. Brooks v. Central Sainte JeanneSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McVicar v. WR Arthur & CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Greer v. PierceMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stallcup v. United Gas Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Serano v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. McVicar v. WR Arthur & CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API