Legal Opinion

Aletum v. Kuehne and Nagel Company

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 23, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01972Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MICHAEL ALETUM Plaintiff Civil Action No. ELH-19-1972 v. KUEHNE + NAGEL COMPANY Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The self-represented plaintiff, Michael Aletum, has filed an employment discrimination action against defendant “Kuehne + Nagel Company” (“Kuehne”)1 under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq. ECF 8 (the “Amended Complaint”).2 Plaintiff, who is deaf, alleges that Kuehne asked him “illegal questions” during a job interview and declined to hire him because of his…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API