Legal Opinion

Drs. Weiland, Keiser, Jones, Shufflebarger, Cooper, P. A. v. Tindall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1979No. 79-502PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners seek review of an order denying their motion for protective order with respect to the production of certain items subpoenaed by the respondent.

This proceeding arose out of a dispute between the parties regarding compensation and stock purchase matters. There is a suit pending in which petitioners are suing respondent and respondent has answered and also filed a counterclaim against the petitioners seeking an accounting from the petitioners.

In order to obtain discoverable evidence to establish his counterclaim, respondent sought production of certain books and records belonging to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. CRAWFORD CO. FINANCIAL SERV. v. GochDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. International Business Machines Corp. v. ElderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arthur Finnieston, Inc. v. PrattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Zebouni v. TolerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Schlesinger v. SchlesingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Andrew Byers, etc. v. Digital Radiology, Inc., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  5. Timothy J. Ryan and Farm Direct Supply, LLC v. Ayco FarmsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API