Legal Opinion
Arthur Finnieston, Inc. v. Pratt
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 22, 1996No. 96-345PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
673 So.2d 560 (1996)
ARTHUR FINNIESTON, INC. and Biosculptor Corp., Petitioners,
v.
Greg PRATT and Lucy S. Pratt, a/k/a Lucia S. Pratt, Respondents.
No. 96-345.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 22, 1996.
Howard W. Mazloff, Miami, for petitioners.
Stettin & Coleman and Roderick F. Coleman, Miami, for respondents.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GREEN, JJ.
2Per curiam
By way of common law certiorari, petitioners seek review of an order denying their motion for protective order and compelling them to produce certain information deemed by them to be (1) relevant only to an action for an…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Rare Coin-It, Inc. v. IJE, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- CRAWFORD CO. FINANCIAL SERV. v. GochDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Drs. Weiland, Keiser, Jones, Shufflebarger, Cooper, P. A. v. TindallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
4Cited by10 opinions
- Sea Coast Fire, Inc. v. Triangle Fire, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. CabreraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- General Caulking Coating Co. v. J.D. Waterproofing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- VIRGINIA ELEC. & LIGHTING CORP. v. KoesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Schlesinger v. SchlesingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.