Legal Opinion
Albert v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 29, 2004No. 02-2052PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Victoria Albert filed this suit against her former employer, Smith’s Food & Drug Centers, Inc. (“Smith’s”), and individual defendants, Dallon Clarkson and Kevin Slowey. Albert alleged that Smith’s failed to reasonably accommodate her asthmatic condition, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (“ADA”), and the New Mexico Human Rights Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. § 28-1-7 (1978) (“NMHRA”). Albert also alleged state law interference with contract claims against Clarkson and Slowey. The district court granted summary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervening v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Brazell v. PHH Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Aubrey v. KoppesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Haynes, Charles v. Williams, AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.