Legal Opinion

Blasche v. Himelick, Admrs.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1965No. 19,766PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

— This case comes to us on appeal from a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court. The issues were tried before the court without a jury and were formed by the appellants’ complaint of one paragraph attacking the validity of a certain deed by reason of fraud and undue influence and the answer of the appellee-defendant under Supreme Court rule 1-3. The plaintiffs below, appellants herein, claimed to be heirs of one Robert Viner the grantor in the deed in question. The defendant E. Ralph Himlick died after the case was filed and his son John H. Himelick as administrator of the estate of E. Ralph…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stockton v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. State v. HamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bell v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Steigerwald v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Liggett v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bell v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Mitchell v. DrakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API