Legal Opinion

Reyburn v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1936No. Civ. No. 10781PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal on the judgment roll alone from a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.

The complaint alleged that on September 21, 1927, Joseph Stuart Reyburn and Rose B. Reyburn, husband and wife, entered into a property settlement, dividing their property and agreeing that they would not revoke reciprocal wills which they executed on the same date. Thereafter the parties were divorced and Joseph Stuart Reyburn married Edna Hunt Reyburn, and executed a new will, naming as sole beneficiaries Edna Hunt Reyburn and his son. He died March 7, 1932. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rundell v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Lynn v. Knob Hill Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Chadbourne v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Del Porto v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API