Legal Opinion

Richard v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1956No. 624-52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

This is an action by a retired naval officer, for the difference between the active-duty and retired pay of his grade as commander from January 1, 1947, to March 31, 1952, when he attained the age of 62 years, on the ground that his retirement on January 1, 1947, was ineffective because he had not received a retiring board hearing. In the alternative plaintiff asks for the difference in pay from January 1,1947, until August 16, 1947, on the ground that while receiving treatment in a Navy hospital he was performing active duty. Plaintiff further claims this alleged active service increased his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. BurchardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. United States v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Wales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borys v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  2. Chester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API