Legal Opinion
Castrillo v. Stimulation Technology, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1980No. 10934PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SARTAIN, Judge.
This litigation arises out of the surgical implantation of a pacemaker. The defendants are Stimulation Technology, Inc., (Stimulation), Touro Infirmary Hospital and Drs. Warren L. Gottsegen, Dennis M. L. Rosenberg, Raja Dhurandhar and F. J. Valen. The trial court sustained peremptory exceptions of prescription as to each of these defendants except Stimulation. This appeal followed. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
On September 13, 1974 Dr. Gottsegen, assisted by Dr. Valen, performed the surgical implantation on plaintiff at Touro Infirmary. Approximately eight to ten days…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cartwright v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Young v. ClementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Duhon v. SaloomLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Dauzat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mistich v. Cordis Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- April v. Associated Catholic CharitiesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993