Legal Opinion

Young v. Clement

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 29, 1979No. 62789PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

367 So.2d 828 (1979)

Roy YOUNG et ux.

v.

Richard J. CLEMENT, M. D., et al.

No. 62789.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 29, 1979.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1979.

Robert W. Clements, Bernard H. McLaughlin, Jr., Stockwell, Sievert, Vicellio, Clements & Shaddock, Reginald W. Farrar, Jr., Raggio, Farrar, Cappel & Chozen, Lake Charles, for defendants-respondents.

Reuvan N. Rougeau, Roche & Rougeau, Lake Charles, for plaintiffs-applicants.

DIXON, Justice.[*]

In this medical malpractice suit exceptions of prescription were sustained in the trial court and affirmed on appeal. Young v. Clement et al., 359…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Young v. ClementLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. GatchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Griffin v. KinbergerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Jordan v. Employee Transfer Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Gunter v. PlaucheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API