Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 2005No. PD-393-04PublishedCited by 199 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated rape in 1987 and the jury assessed a life sentence. In 2001, he filed a pro se motion for forensic DNA testing under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 64 and requested that counsel be appointed to represent him. Counsel was appointed and a formal motion for forensic DNA testing was filed, accompanied by an affidavit by Smith stating that he is actually innocent of the offense for which he was convicted. The trial court denied the motion, 1 stating that the motion failed to include an affidavit alleging specific facts in support of his motion and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Whitaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

3Cited by199 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GutierrezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Routier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Holberg, Brittany Marlowe AKA Johnson, Brittany MarloweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. State of Texas v. Swearingen, Larry RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API