Legal Opinion

King v. Cash

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1941No. 2155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

V. G. Cash instituted this suit against Kate King and the children of Kate King and Willis King, deceased, on a promissory note and for foreclosure of an alleged vendor’s lien. Cash alleged that on February 25, 1938, Kate King executed and delivered to him a promissory note for $120 due in October, 1938. Plaintiff alleged, in addition to the usual contents of such a note, that it provided “This note is given as part payment- for Block No. 56 of the Original Addition to the town of Comanche, Texas.” Cash further alleged that on December 18, 1937, he executed and delivered to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lanier v. Foust and DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Flanagan v. CushmanTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Pridgen v. FurnishTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Hitson v. GilmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. D. Sullivan & Co. v. SchreinerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twin City Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. King v. CashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API