Legal Opinion

Mellon v. International Shoe Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 18, 1929No. 3470PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

As an original question it is certainly arguable whether the statutory provision for written notice of the petition and bond for removal constitutes an essential step in removal proceedings. That question has, however, been settled in this court by the decision of Judge Dodge. Arthur v. Maryland Casualty Co., 216 F. 386. Assuming it to be an essential step, I do not think that anything which counsel for the plaintiff said or did, as stated in the agreed facts, amounted to a waiver of it. The ease when first entered in this court was remandable.

The further question is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arthur v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914
  2. Philadelphia & Boston Face Brick Co. v. WarfordDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
  3. Enders v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of HonorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. In RE: MILLENIUM SEACARRIERS, INC., DEBTOR, UNIVERSAL OIL LTD, LIBERIAN INTERNATIONAL SHIP & CORPORATE REGISTRY, LLC v. ALLFIRST BANK, FORMERLY KNOWN AS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND, FORMERLY KNOWN AS WAYLAND INVESTMENT FUNDS, LLC, ASPIDA TRAVEL, LTD, ASSURANCE FORENINGEN SKULD (GJENSIDIG)—DEN DAN, BREAKBULK MARINE SERVICES, LTD., CANFORNAV, LTD., THE CREW OF THE DEBTOR'S VESSELL DET NORSKE VERITAS FUEL AND MARINE MARKETING, GULF STATES MARINE, INC, IHI MARINE CO., LTD., KENT TRADE & FINANCE, MARITIME TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF RUSSIA, OMNI NAVIGATION, LTD., ORIENT SHIPPING, PACNAV, S.A., PANCOAST TRADING, S.A., TOTAL FINA ELF LUBRIFIANTS, S.A., UNISERVICE MEDITERRA, PRAXIS ENERGY AGENTS S.A., PRAXIS ENERGY AGENTS S.A. v. ALLFIRST BANK, FORMERLY KNOWN AS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND, FORMERLY KNOWN AS WAYLAND INVESTMENTS FUNDS, LLC, MILLENIUM SEACARRIERS, INC., IVY NAVIGATION, LTD., MILLENIUM II, INC., MILLENIUM IV, INC., MILLENIUM V, INC., MILLENIUM VI, INC., MILLENIUM ALEKSANDER, INC., MILLENIUM AMETHYST, INC., MILLENIUM ASSET INC., MILLENIUM BALTIC, INC., ASPIDA TRAVEL, LTD., ASSURANCE FORENINGEN SKULD (GJENSIDIG)—DEN DAN, BREAKBULK MARINE SERVICES, LTD., CANFORNAV, LTD., THE CREW OF THE DEBTOR'S VESSELL DET NORSKE VERITAS FUEL AND MARINE MARKETING, GULF STATES MARINE, INC, IHI MARINE CO., LTD., KENT TRADE & FINANCE, MARITIME TRANSPORT WORKERS, UNION OF RUSSIA, OMNI NAVIGATION, LTD., ORIENT SHIPPING, PACNAV, S.A., PANCOAST TRADING S.A., TOTAL FINA ELF LUBRIFIANTS, S.A., UNISERVICE MEDITERRACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Universal Oil Ltd. v. Allfirst BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Intercoastal Refining Co., Inc. v. JalilDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
  5. Green v. ZuckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API