Legal Opinion

Sam Lieberman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 13, 1958No. 13928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47BURGER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from conviction of passing forged promissory notes. Appellant Lieberman does not deny passing the notes, but denies they were forged.

Appellant conducted a thriving home improvement contracting business. Pressed for working capital as the trial court said, “it became necessary * * to devise some method of raising money to pay for labor and material during the interim between the execution and the completion of the contracts.” Appellant’s solution was to induce customers, at the time the contracts were made, to sign notes and deeds of trust in blank.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. State v. ShurtliffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
  3. People v. NessethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Austin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Driver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Millrose Corporation v. Calvin P. Brent, Millrose Corporation v. Barbara E. HicksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Sam Lieberman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API