People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. Cramer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*515Opinion
REGAN, J.
On May 3, 1967, plaintiff filed a complaint in eminent domain seeking to condemn for freeway purposes certain properties owned by defendants. The pretrial conference order filed on December 22, 1967, provided that certain issues of law were to be tried by the court sitting without a jury. Following trial, the court on August 6, 1968, made the following order:
“1. Interstate 880 and interstate 80 are two separate projects.
“2. The defendants herein are entitled to any enhancement in value of their property which results from it’s |>zc] proximity to interstate 880.”1
Thereafter, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- United States v. Arlo C. Crance, J. v. Crance, Ralph O. Crance, Minnie Newport, Rose B. McKeeand Elizabeth MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- PEOPLE EX REL. DEPT. PUB. WKS. v. CramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971