Legal Opinion

United States v. Holmes

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 26, 1983No. CM 442655PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HANFT, Judge:

During the guilty-plea inquiry in this general court-martial, the trial judge failed to advise the defendant that he was subject to a fine in addition to total forfeitures. Nonetheless, the sentence imposed by the judge included both a fine and total forfeitures which were approved by the convening authority. This was error. While the incomplete advice did not invalidate the plea of guilty, “before both total forfeitures and a fine can be approved the appellant must have been advised during the [guilty-plea] inquiry that his pecuniary loss could exceed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. WhittierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. WhitekillerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. ShirleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. PolomskiU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API