United States v. Holmes
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HANFT, Judge:
During the guilty-plea inquiry in this general court-martial, the trial judge failed to advise the defendant that he was subject to a fine in addition to total forfeitures. Nonetheless, the sentence imposed by the judge included both a fine and total forfeitures which were approved by the convening authority. This was error. While the incomplete advice did not invalidate the plea of guilty, “before both total forfeitures and a fine can be approved the appellant must have been advised during the [guilty-plea] inquiry that his pecuniary loss could exceed the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. WhittierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. WhitekillerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. ShirleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. PolomskiU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984