Legal Opinion

Weinreich v. Permanent Building & Savings Ass'n

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1937No. 1491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

The plaintiff instituted this action on his own behalf and as a class suit against the defendants. The cause was presented, in the main, to the trial judge upon a stipulation of facts signed by attorneys for all the parties. Some testimony was taken touching the question whether or not formal demand had been made by Mr. Weinreich and another creditor, Mr. Crawford, as secretary and attorney for the Woodland Cemetery Association, for interest on their claims against defendants.

Upon the record it appears that on September 29, .1933, the Superintendent of Building and Loan…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clint v. Franklin Bargain House, Inc.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1941
  2. Goldzwig v. MerionOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Weinrich v. Franklin Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API