Legal Opinion
Sage v. Parkersburg Rig & Reel Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1935No. 1306PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
• Sage and Boughner brought this suit against the Parkersburg Company for alleged infringement of Patent No. 1,476,-648, applied for October 11, 1923, relating to a sand reel mechanism in combination with a standard oil well drilling rig.
The elements of claim one of the patent are:
In combination with a standard well drilling rig including a derrick, a sheave at its top, front and back jack posts, a band wheel shaft and a band wheel, a sand reel mechanism consisting of,(1) A driven shaft, (2) a sand reel spool on the driven shaft in line with the sheave, (3) a sand line…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Linville v. MilbergerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Midland Flour Milling Co. v. BobbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Gates Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Lees-Bradner Co. v. National Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cole v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- United States Air Conditioning Corporation, a Corporation v. Governair Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Southwest Industrial Products, Inc. v. Ezee Stone Cutter Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
- Mills v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- D. B. Cole v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, B. F. Conaghan v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation v. R. W. FordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.