Legal Opinion
Mills v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 26, 1938No. 7038PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
The Patent Office rejected appellant’s application for a patent covering a refrigerating apparatus designed for freezing ice cream in commercial establishments. Appellant sued under the provisions of Section 4915, R.S., 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. This appeal is from a decree dismissing his bill.
The lower court made findings as follows :
“2. Plaintiff’s application relates to an ■ice cream freezer construction. The container for the cream is surrounded by a casing into which a refrigerant such as liquid methyl chloride is fed from a compressor in a direct expansion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Blanchard v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946