Spearman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge
Nathaniel Spearman appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon,1 a class B felony. On appeal he raises the following issue, which we restate as: whether the trial court violated Spearman's rights to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it denied Spearman's motion to bifurcate portions of the proceedings.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On the evening of September 28, 1999, officers of the Indianapolis Police Department responded to the report of an altercation between Spearman and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Olkey v. Hyperion 1999 Term Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. TavaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Hines v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Gray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Person v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.