Wyatt v. Giles
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Larry D. Vaught, Judge.
On appeal Jim Wyatt argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the claim filed against him by Tracy Giles. Specifically, he argues that the trial court misapplied Arkansas’s Uniform Arbitration Act, codified at§ 16-108-201 (Repl. 2006). We affirm.
On October 13, 2004, Tracy Giles filed a complaint against Wyatt and Visual Cosmetic Changes. In her complaint she specified that she was alleging “an action in tort for negligence.” She claimed that Jim Wyatt breached his duty of care by failing to “sufficiently numb [Giles’s]…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- American Insurance v. CazortSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- Diamante v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Pine Hills Health & Rehab. LLC v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Hamilton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- The Madison Cos., LLC v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Terminix International Co. v. TrivittCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.