Legal Opinion

Sherrod v. Williams

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 27, 2024No. 3:14-cv-00454Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TRESSA SHERROD, et al/., Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:14-cv-454 Vv. Judge Walter H. Rice WAL-MART STORES, INC., et a/., : Defendants. ORDER OVERRULING MOTION /N L/M/NE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING WAL-MART FAILING TO PROVIDE NOTICE AND/OR SIGNAGE THAT OHIO IS AN OPEN CARRY STATE OF DEFENDANTS WAL-MART STORES, INC., AND WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. (DOC. #350) Before the Court is the Motion jn Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Wal-Mart Failing to Provide Notice and/or Signage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. MassingillOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API