Legal Opinion

State v. Frost

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 2015No. S14G1767PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackwell, Justice.

This case concerns the meaning of paragraph (a) (1) of OCGA § 24-4-417 (“Rule 417”), which provides:

In a criminal proceeding involving a prosecution for a violation of Code Section 40-6-391, evidence of the commission of another violation of Code Section 40-6-391 on a differ ent occasion by the same accused shall be admissible when ... [t]he accused refused in the current case to take the state administered test required by Code Section 40-5-55 and such evidence is relevant to prove knowledge, plan, or absence of mistake or accident....

Gary Frost was charged with driving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. Chan v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  4. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. Baird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Olds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  4. State v. AlmanzaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API