State v. Frost
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackwell, Justice.
This case concerns the meaning of paragraph (a) (1) of OCGA § 24-4-417 (“Rule 417”), which provides:
In a criminal proceeding involving a prosecution for a violation of Code Section 40-6-391, evidence of the commission of another violation of Code Section 40-6-391 on a differ ent occasion by the same accused shall be admissible when ... [t]he accused refused in the current case to take the state administered test required by Code Section 40-5-55 and such evidence is relevant to prove knowledge, plan, or absence of mistake or accident....
Gary Frost was charged with driving…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Chan v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Baird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Olds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- State v. AlmanzaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.