State v. Almanza
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
*3**553We granted certiorari to decide whether hearsay identifying the alleged sexual abuser of a child victim is admissible under the hearsay exception for statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment found in OCGA § 24-8-803 (4) ("Rule 803 (4)"). Under the new Evidence Code, we know that Georgia evidence rules that track the federal rules are to be interpreted according to federal case law, while rules that were instead carried over from the old Evidence Code are to be interpreted according to our case law interpreting the old Code. But Georgia Rule 803 (4)…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ohio v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- Bullard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.