Legal Opinion

A-7 Austin, LLC v. Bridgestone HosePower, LLC

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 15, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00042Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION A-7 AUSTIN, LLC D/B/A AUSTIN HOSE, Plaintiff, . V. 2:24-CV-42-Z-BR BRIDGESTONE HOSEPOWER, LLC and ANDREW KURON, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction And Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (“MTD”) (ECF Nos. 14, 16). The MTD is DENIED. BACKGROUND The parties dispute whether Defendant Andrew Kuron (“Kuron”) misappropriated trade secrets obtained during his employment at A-7 Austin, LLC d/b/a Austin Hose…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API