Legal Opinion
Erick Caffarello v. Paul Hilmo, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 19, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02945Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Erick Caffarello, No. CV-25-02945-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Paul Hilmo, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This Order addresses Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter 16 Jurisdiction (Doc. 15) and Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default (Doc. 18). 17 I. 18 Plaintiff, pro se, filed three complaints in quick succession. The complaint that 19 initiated this case is typed and asserts federal question jurisdiction along with various 20 federal claims arising from the suspension of Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Brandt v. American Bankers Ins. Co. of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.