Legal Opinion

Athletic Tea Co. v. McCormack

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

This is a suit upon a contract and bond by appellant against O. C. Langford, as principal, and R. -F. Marsh, and appellee, sureties, for the faithful performance of the contract. The contract sued upon was an employment contract, whereby O. C. Langford was employed by appellant as its sales representative in Little Rock. O. C. Langford was obligated in the contract to pay appellant all sums collected by him for it in the prosecution of the business. The bond was an obligation in the sum of $500 executed by Langford, as principal, and Marsh, and appellee, sureties, to appellant, conditioned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. BoyetteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Antrim v. McKelroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Hutcheson v. ClappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Parker v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Furst and Thomas v. RowlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Gazette Publishing Company v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API