Legal Opinion

Deodato v. Hartford Insurance Company

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 18, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

154 N.J. Super. 263 (1977)

381 A.2d 354

JOHN DEODATO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted October 31, 1977.

Decided November 18, 1977.

Before Judges ALLCORN, MORGAN and HORN.

Mr. George J. Sokalski, attorney for appellant (Mr. Peter Peletz, Jr., of counsel).

Messrs. Harwood, Lloyd, Ryan, Kelly, Coyle & Wulster, attorneys for respondent.

2Per curiam

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Rosenberg in his opinion at 143 N.J. Super. 396. See also, Williams v. Aetna Cas.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deodato v. Hartford Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Williams v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Memorial Properties, LLC v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API