Legal Opinion

Flagg v. Manhattan Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 21, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBlatchi’obd, C. J.

This suit is brought by three persons as individuals and two persons as copartners, who claim to be owners of shares of the capital stock of the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, 155, 10, 150, and 75 in number, of the par value of $100 each, there being 65,000 shares in all. The three companies defendants are railroad corporations organized under the laws of the state of New York, and will be called the Manhattan, the Metropolitan, and the Now York. The first company had no lines of railway. The second and third companies had elevated railways in the city of New York. On the twentieth of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. . Thompson'sNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Vedder v. Superintendents of the PoorNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. Bartow Lumber Co. v. EnwrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Macon, D. & S. R. Co. v. ShailerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  5. Friedman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API