People v. Clayberg
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County and from an order denying a new trial. Clifton H. Connick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. M. Frost, and Coonan & Kehoe, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendant was charged by an information, filed in the superior court of Humboldt County, with the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed on the twenty-ninth day of May, 1914, upon the person of one Garland White, a female. Upon said information the defendant was duly tried, and a verdict of guilty of the offense so charged was returned by the jury.
The defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied, and from the judgment and the order denying said motion he presents these appeals.
The first point made by the defendant is that the district attorney was without authority to file a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. MolinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. ScarboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. ChoberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- People v. EmmeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. NahhasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.