Legal Opinion
Central Delivery Service v. Burch
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 31, 1973No. Civ. 71-316-TPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are motor carriers having their principal office in Maryland and operating out of a terminal or garage in Maryland. Some of their operations are in interstate commerce, and plaintiffs are therefore subject to the provisions of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., formerly known as the Motor Carrier Act, 1935, which vests in the Interstate Commerce Commission the regulation of the “transportation of passengers or property by motor carriers engaged in interstate or foreign commerce”. 1 Some of those functions, including the power to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morgan v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- William Dove v. George A. Coupe, James Dovean Jewell v. George A. Coupe, D/B/A Admiral Limousine ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Pettis Moving Co., Inc. v. Lillian Roberts, Industrial Commissioner of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. Betty L. Tianti, Commissioner of Labor of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Common Carriers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Caryk v. CoupeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.