Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1979No. KCD 29859PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from the order of the trial court denying relief to appellant on his Rule 27.26 motion. Supporting his claim to post trial relief, appellant contended trial counsel was ineffective in (a) failing to supply appropriate advice and information on opportunities for change of venue; (b) adversely affecting appellant’s cause by the conduct of voir dire and in closing argument, and; (c) failing to preserve for appellate review alleged error in closing argument by counsel for the state.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of rape and was sentenced to a term of thirty years.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crosswhite v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Cole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Beeman v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. McConnell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. FitzpatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Coleman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Kelly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Wilhite v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Mitchell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API