Fitzpatrick v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This appeal is from the order of the trial court denying relief to appellant on his Rule 27.26 motion. Supporting his claim to post trial relief, appellant contended trial counsel was ineffective in (a) failing to supply appropriate advice and information on opportunities for change of venue; (b) adversely affecting appellant’s cause by the conduct of voir dire and in closing argument, and; (c) failing to preserve for appellate review alleged error in closing argument by counsel for the state.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of rape and was sentenced to a term of thirty years.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crosswhite v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Cole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Beeman v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- McConnell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. FitzpatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Coleman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Kelly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Wilhite v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mitchell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.