Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Downing
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 25, 2002No. CIV A. 2001-10388-RBCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*284 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Reference is made to the Order (# 19) I issued on April 2, 2002 and the Further Order (# 29) issued on July 16, 2002.
In their Ninth Affirmative Defense to plaintiffs Complaint, defendants assert that:
Plaintiffs Complaint fails for insufficiency of process and/or service of process. By filing this Answer, defendants are not waiving any defenses based on defects in process and/or service of process.
Since the defendants Downing and Sciacca have been dismissed from the case, the issue of the insufficiency of process remains only as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindsey v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Thomas v. Yonkers Police Dept. Transportation UnitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Arum v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- St. John Rennalls v. County of WestchesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Connolly v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Fried v. Wellesley MazdaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Connolly v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Cordova v. Unknown OfficerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021