Legal Opinion

Fried v. Wellesley Mazda

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 9, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSingh, J.

While operating a “loaner” car he had obtained from Hometown Auto Framingham, Inc. (“Hometown Auto”), doing business as Wellesley Mazda (‘Wellesley Mazda”), plaintiff David J. Fried (“Fried”) struck the vehicle of Samuel Grimes (“Grimes”) at a toll booth on the Massachusetts Turnpike. Fried paid $2,226.40 to Grimes in exchange for a release of liability. Fried then sued Hometown Auto and Wellesley Mazda on February 1, 2008 for knowing and wilful violations of G.L. c. 93A and “retaliation.”

On February 14, 2008, Fried served both Hometown Auto, a Massachusetts corporation, and Wellesley Mazda…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lydia Libertad v. Father Patrick WelchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Commissioner of Revenue v. Comcast Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Colley v. Benson, Young & Downs InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. Clamp-All Corp. v. ForestaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Drummer Boy Homes Ass'n v. BrittonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  2. Sewell v. Xpress LubeUtah Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API