Legal Opinion
United States v. 4219 University Drive, Fairfax
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 26, 2013No. 12-1321PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge KEENAN concurred.
OPINION
WYNN, Circuit Judge:
In this case, a federal jury found that the defendant properties—a residence and proceeds seized from a bank account— were subject to civil forfeiture. Specifically, the jury found that each property derived from the proceeds of a health care fraud and money laundering scheme committed by Dr. Mert Kivanc—the son of Turan and Duygu Kivanc (“Claimants”). Claimants, who own the properties, unsuccessfully contested the properties’ forfeiture before the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Price v. City of Charlotte, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. 5443 Suffield Terrace, Skokie, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Rodger Thornton v. Donald N. Snyder, Jr., Director, James M. Schomig, Warden, and Captain Josh J. ShettleworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Holland v. Big River Minerals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Ronald MiltierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Reginald Dargan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Quicksilver LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- United States v. Antonio SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Christopher PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.