Legal Opinion

In re United States for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b)

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 17, 2015No. 2:15-MC-00669-DNPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1267MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

DAVID NUFFER, District Judge.

The United States (the “Government”) has applied (the “Application”) for a preclusion-of-notice order under 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b), commanding a provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service not to notify any person of the existence of a grand jury subpoena which the Government has served on the provider. The Government’s grand jury subpoena seeks non-content information of the sort enumerated, in 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c). The Government’s Application is GRANTED for the reasons addressed below.

BA…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Fayelynn Sams v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. In re United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  2. In re the Search Warrant for [redacted].comDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  3. In re Search Warrant Issued to Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API