Legal Opinion
Wedtech Corp. v. Hurdman (In Re Wedtech Corp.)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 16, 1987No. Bankruptcy No. 86 B 1236 (HCB), Adv. Nos. 87-5342A, 87-5341A, Nos. 87 CIV 7139 (LBS), 87 CIV 7220 (LBS)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
In this adversary proceeding by debtor in bankruptcy Wedtech Corp. against its former accountants, KMG Main Hurdman and Touche Ross & Co., defendant accounting firms have moved to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the motions to dismiss are denied without prejudice to motions after discovery.
As in Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 453 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880, 103 S.Ct. 177, 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982), the allegations of the debtor here, although brought under many different theories, all sound in malpractice. We find that, as alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Schacht v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- In Re Investors Funding Corp., Etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Kirschner v. KPMG LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bankruptcy Services, Inc. v. Ernst & Young (In Re CBI Holding Co.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Goldin v. Primavera Familienstiftung, Tag Associates, Ltd. (In Re Granite Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- American Tissue, Inc. v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.