Legal Opinion

Bolz v. Hatfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2001No. 23614PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParrish, P.J.

Bradly S. Bolz and Patricia Bolz (plaintiffs) sought determination of their and Sang Leininger’s (defendant) respective interests in certain real estate situate in Phelps County, Missouri. The trial court entered summary judgment declaring plaintiffs to be holders of “fee simple interest in the Property.” Defendant appeals. This court affirms.

Prior to November 7, 1994, Isaac R. Hatfield, a single person, held title in fee simple absolute to the real estate in question. On November 7, 1994, Mr. Hatfield executed a beneficiary deed to the property, as grantor, to defendant, as grantee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. PrelutskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Farmers' Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. Shores v. Express Lending Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Barkley v. Carter County State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Atkins v. McPhetridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Daniel v. Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Rogers v. Hester Ex Rel. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Breitenfeld v. School District of ClaytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Pool v. Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API