Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Horn

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2000No. 99-1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

This is a death penalty case. Petitioner Raymond Whitney (“Whitney”) seeks ha-beas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial and/or a new sentencing hearing because of numerous violations of his constitutional rights.

The gruesome events out of which this case arises are described in great detail by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in its opinion in Commonwealth v. Whitney, 511 Pa. 232, 512 A.2d 1152, 1154-55 (1986). Suffice it to' say that in the early morning hours October 10, 1981, Whitney broke into the West…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WhitneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pursell v. HornDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API