Legal Opinion

Wade v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 2, 2006No. 04-C-0704PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STADTMUELLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Brian Wade alleges that his employer DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“DaimlerChrysler”) failed to accommodate his disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. Wade also alleges that DaimlerChrysler retaliated against him in violation of the ADA. Daimler-Chrysler has filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court grants summary judgment with respect to the retaliation claim and denies summary judgment with respect to the failure to accommodate claim.

BACKGROUND

DaimlerChrys…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Victor v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API