Legal Opinion

State v. Mursal

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 24, 2013No. 2012AP2775-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURLEY, PJ.

¶ 1. Ali Mursal appeals the judgment convicting him of second-degree sexual assault, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.225(2)(a) (2007-08),1 and kid *184napping as party to a crime, contrary Wis. Stat. §§ 940.31(l)(c) & 939.05 (2007-08), and appeals the orders denying his postconviction motions. Mursal argues that he is entitled to withdraw his plea because the trial court, in providing him the immigration warning pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 971.08(l)(c), did not state the statutory language verbatim, but instead gave a warning that substantially complied with the statute and included very…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. GallionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ocanas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. DouangmalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Jose Alberto Reyes FuerteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. Reyes FuerteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
  3. State v. Jose Alberto Reyes FuerteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. PocknellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API