Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Prudential Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
The plaintiff, as beneficiary under a policy of life insurance, brought this action to recover under a clause providing for double indemnity in case of accidental death. At the close of the case the defendant moved for a directed verdict, which motion was granted by the court, and the plaintiff appeals. The policy provided:
“Upon receipt at the Home Office of due proof that the death of the Insured occurred as a result, directly and independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent and accidental means * * * (but) no such benefit shall be payable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Accident Co. v. ReigartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HudginsTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Kendall v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Jenkins v. Hawyeye Commercial Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Century Companies of America v. KrahlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992