Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Prudential Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiff, as beneficiary under a policy of life insurance, brought this action to recover under a clause providing for double indemnity in case of accidental death. At the close of the case the defendant moved for a directed verdict, which motion was granted by the court, and the plaintiff appeals. The policy provided:

“Upon receipt at the Home Office of due proof that the death of the Insured occurred as a result, directly and independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent and accidental means * * * (but) no such benefit shall be payable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Accident Co. v. ReigartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HudginsTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Kendall v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Jenkins v. Hawyeye Commercial Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Century Companies of America v. KrahlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API