Dodge v. Lee Apparel Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation case.
Following an ore tenus proceeding, the Circuit Court of Mobile County found Edna Dodge (employee) to be fifty percent permanently and partially disabled. It further concluded that she suffered a loss in earning capacity of fifty percent. There is no dispute that the employee’s injuries arose out of and in the course of her employment with Lee Apparel Company (employer). Rather, the employee appeals, alleging that the trial court erred in failing to find that she incurred a one hundred percent loss in earning ability. We affirm.
Initially, we…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bankhead Forest Industries, Inc. v. LovettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Dees v. Daleville FloristCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Lewis G. Reed & Sons, Inc. v. WimbleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Whitehead Forest Products v. HugginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- General Electric Co. v. AllredCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992