Robert O. Clouser, Individually and as Members of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Hot Shoppes, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment
2Per curiam
This case came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel; and the trial judge having determined that the administrative record as stipulated is insufficient for the achievement of finality and having accordingly directed a remand for further proceedings before the Board of Zoning Adjustment at which additional testimony and argument may be adduced, as from Judge Youngdahl’s opinion will more fully appear,
Now, upon consideration of the foregoing and of the record before this court,
It is Ordered…
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Brawner Building, Inc. v. R. Roderick Shehyn, Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lakeside Community Hospital v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1978
- Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.