Legal Opinion
Tamosaitis v. URS Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2014No. 12-35924PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The panel has voted to amend its opinion filed November 7, 2014, and published at 771 F.3d 589, and to deny appellees URS Corporation, URS Energy and Construction Inc., and URS Inc.’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc with the following amendments:
On page 551, change <URS E & C stipulated in the district court that> to <URS E & C assumed, for purposes of its summary judgment motion, that>.
On page 557, note 9, change <the majority of state courts > to <some state courts >.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Roy v. Correct Care Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Michael Frost v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- David Sanders v. Energy NorthwestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- BNSF Railway Company v. U.S. Dept. of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.