Legal Opinion
In Re Prudence Bonds Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 11, 1935No. 259PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
75 F.2d 262 (1935)
In re PRUDENCE BONDS CORPORATION.
RADIN
v.
CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST CO. et al.
No. 259.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 11, 1935.
Harry H. Oshrin and Nathan Stieglitz, both of New York City, for appellant.
Cotton, Franklin, Wright & Gordon, of New York City (Paul W. Williams, of New York City, of counsel), for Chemical Bank.
Charles H. Kelby, of New York City (Clinton J. Ruch, of New York City, of counsel), for Kelby and others.
Archibald Palmer, of New York City (Harry D. Glicksman, of New York City, on the brief), amici curiæ for intervening creditors.
Before L. HAND,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re Central Funding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Radin v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
3Cited by15 opinions
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. Adolf Gobel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re Prima Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Thompson v. Terminal Shares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- First Nat. Bank v. Conway Road Estates Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. Tacoma Oriental S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.